Why Do I Keep Playing the Same Role in Relationships? — an article by Carl Argent

You meet someone new.

At first, things feel different.

You tell yourself this relationship won’t follow the same path as the last one.

Yet months or years later, you find yourself having the same arguments, feeling the same frustrations, and wondering how you ended up here again.

Different person. Same story.

As a relationship therapist, I’ve noticed that people rarely repeat relationships. They repeat patterns.

The names change. The circumstances change. But the emotional experience often stays remarkably familiar.

Why?

We Learn Relationships Before We Understand Them

Long before we know anything about love, communication or attachment, we’re already learning how relationships work.

We learn whether people are available when we need them.

We learn whether our feelings are welcomed or dismissed.

We learn whether asking for help feels safe or risky.

Without realising it, we build a set of expectations about ourselves and other people.

Some people grow up believing:

“I can rely on others, and others can rely on me.”

Others learn something different:

“People leave.”

“I have to do everything myself.”

“If I don’t stay close, I’ll be forgotten.”

These aren’t conscious decisions. They’re conclusions formed through experience.

And they often follow us into adult relationships.

The Same Fight Isn’t Really The Same Fight

Couples often come to therapy wanting help with communication.

What they usually discover is that communication isn’t the problem.

A forgotten text message isn’t about a text message.

A disagreement about money isn’t really about money.

A disagreement about household chores isn’t usually about chores.

Beneath the surface are deeper questions:

Can I trust you?

Do I matter to you?

Will you be there when I need you?

These are the questions that create emotional intensity.

The argument itself is often just the vehicle.

The Roles We Get Stuck In

Over time, many relationships develop predictable roles.

One partner becomes the pursuer.

The other becomes the withdrawer.

One becomes responsible for everyone’s emotions.

The other struggles to express their own.

One becomes the fixer.

The other becomes the one who needs fixing.

After a while, these roles start to feel like personality traits.

“I’m just an anxious person.”

“I’m just independent.”

“I’m the strong one.”

“I’m the difficult one.”

But often these are not personality traits at all.

They are relationship strategies.

Ways of staying safe.

Ways of staying connected.

Ways of avoiding pain.

The problem is that the strategies that protected us in the past can limit us in the present.

Why We Keep Repeating The Pattern

Human beings are drawn to what feels familiar.

Even when familiar doesn’t feel good.

A person who fears abandonment may become highly sensitive to distance.

A person who fears dependence may keep emotional walls in place.

A person who fears rejection may constantly seek reassurance.

A person who fears criticism may become defensive before any criticism arrives.

None of this happens because people want difficult relationships.

It happens because old protective patterns are still operating beneath the surface.

The relationship becomes the stage on which an old script is performed again and again.

The Good News: Scripts Can Be Rewritten

Many people assume that if they’ve always been a certain way, they always will be.

Fortunately, relationships don’t work like that.

People can learn new ways of relating.

When someone experiences consistency, acceptance and emotional safety, old assumptions begin to loosen.

Trust grows.

Defensiveness softens.

Vulnerability becomes less frightening.

People start asking for what they need more directly and responding to others more openly.

This is one of the reasons therapy can be so powerful.

Not because someone gives you answers.

Because you experience a different kind of relationship.

And different experiences create different possibilities.

A Question Worth Asking

The next time you find yourself in a familiar relationship struggle, try asking yourself:

What role am I playing here?

Not who is right.

Not who is wrong.

Not what my partner needs to change.

What role am I playing?

Because lasting change rarely begins with finding a different partner.

It begins with recognising the script you’ve been following and deciding whether it’s still helping you create the relationships you want.

The role you’ve been playing isn’t who you are.

It’s simply the role you’ve learned.

And what is learned can be changed.

If you want support changing these patterns together, relationship counselling offers a structured space to understand the cycle and practise a different way of relating.

How I can help

If you keep becoming the fixer, the peacemaker or the person who withdraws, I can help you explore what that role protects and what it costs. In relationship counselling, we can look together at how each person responds and how the pattern keeps going.

There is space to name needs that have been difficult to express and practise a more direct conversation or boundary. You can also explore your own relationship patterns in individual counselling with me. Understanding the role creates more room to decide how you want to respond, rather than feeling you have to keep playing it.

If you keep thinking “here I am again”, we can look at that familiar moment together. Relationship counselling can involve you and your partner, or you can explore your own experience in individual counselling. You do not have to persuade someone else to attend before asking about support for yourself. You can book a free introductory conversation with no obligation to book sessions, or read more about relationship counselling with me.

Sources

An, D., Kochanska, G., Yeager, N., Sivagurunathan, N., Praska, R., Campbell, R. R., & Shin, S. (2021). Children’s emerging receptive, positive orientation toward their parents in the network of early attachment relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 23(2), 125–146.

Arriaga, X. B., Kumashiro, M., Simpson, J. A., & Overall, N. C. (2018). Revising working models across time: Relationship situations that enhance attachment security. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 71–96.

Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1–2), 3–35.

Busby, D. M., Hanna-Walker, V., & Yorgason, J. B. (2020). A closer look at attachment, sexuality, and couple relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(1), 260–280.

Candel, O., & Turliuc, M. N. (2019). Insecure attachment and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis of actor and partner associations. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 190–199.

Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644–663.

Collins, N. L., Ford, M. B., Guichard, A. C., & Allard, L. M. (2006). Working models of attachment and attribution processes in intimate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 201–219.

Dallos, R., & Vetere, A. (2012). Systems theory, family attachments and processes of triangulation: Does the concept of triangulation offer a useful bridge? Psychotherapy Section Review, 48, 27–36.

Dugan, K. A., & Fraley, R. C. (2022). The roles of parental and partner attachment working models in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(7), 2228–2252.

Ein-Dor, T., & Hirschberger, G. (2016). Rethinking attachment theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 223–227.

Levy, K. N., Kivity, Y., Johnson, B. N., & Gooch, C. V. (2018). Adult attachment as a predictor and moderator of psychotherapy outcome: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(11), 1996–2013.

Li, T., & Chan, D. K.-S. (2012). How anxious and avoidant attachment affect romantic relationship quality differently: A meta‐analytic review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 406–419.

Marín-Cavestany, M., de la Cruz, M. A., Durán, J. I., Stiles, W. B., Lahera, G., & Andrade-González, N. (2025). Influence of therapist attachment style on the working alliance in individual psychotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 32(1), 15–32.

Notsu, H., Blansfield, R., Spina, D. S., & Levy, K. N. (2024). An updated meta-analysis of the relation between adult attachment style and working alliance. Psychotherapy Research, 34(4), 691–705.

Overall, N. C., & Simpson, J. A. (2015). Attachment and dyadic regulation processes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 61–66.

Ross, A. S., Hinshaw, A. B., & Murdock, N. L. (2016). Integrating the relational matrix: Attachment style, differentiation of self, triangulation, and experiential avoidance. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38(2), 221–231.

Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 971–980.

Simpson, J. A., & Overall, N. C. (2014). Partner buffering of attachment insecurity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 54–59.

Slade, A., & Holmes, J. (2019). Attachment and psychotherapy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 152–156.